I can't count the times I've heard the word "tragedy" after an Islamic extremist has slaughtered innocents. Somehow the word just does not fit the occasion or carry the significance called for. And I suppose that's because the word could just as well be employed with the occurrence of a natural disaster or, perhaps, within the context of a major accident. The use of tragedy as a descriptor also belies reality, inasmuch as our popular culture and those who shape it persist in obscuring the gravity of the situation in which we presently find ourselves. Somehow we try to cover it all up with candlelight vigils and makeshift memorials featuring Teddy bears, reassuring ourselves that what is cruel, sadistic and brutal has not become ordinary and commonplace.
During the weekend, I became nauseous when I encountered the words of a presidential candidate, who once again, despite Nice and all the other gory manifestations of Islamic extremism, reminded us that we were not at war with Islam. Why such a simpleton would inflict such idiocy on her fellow Americans is beyond me.
Yes, it is true that Islam is not a monolithic body, and there are all sorts of interpretations in its belief system. For example, there are Sunnis and Shias; and, among them, are Wahabis, Malakis, Hanbalis, Deobandites, Twelvers, Salafis and many more. But they all fall under the tent of Islam, an institution that at its core is triumphalist, aggressive and expansionist. And, to be sure, those who are fundamental in their interpretation of Islam accept literally all of the exhortations to violence that may be found in the Koran. Need I say that such individuals usually make good terrorists?
I have related many times my encounter with a member of the Muslim Brotherhood during the time I worked in the Middle East. Although he was willing to converse with me, he did not give one red cent for what I thought. His mind was like a brick wall, and there was no way that I would ever be able to penetrate it. So it is with the Omar Mateens, Mohamed Aubdulazizes, Tashfin Maliks and Syed Rizwans of the world. They are beyond what we consider reality, totally outside those concepts that have been seen as engendering morality in the Western world.
As for America, our enemies are not dumb. They have quite properly reasoned that it is much easier to kill Americans in America than on far-flung battlefields. And why not? After all, we are preoccupied with racial discord and the really important issues of the day, such as transgender bathrooms. What better time to exterminate infidels!
Many would label their heinous acts as "cowardly." And, truly, from the Western perspective, their methods are gutless and craven. However, dear readers, to leave it at that totally misses the point. The psychology of a Muslim terrorist is a psychology of evil. There, I've gone and used that awful word, which is not much in vogue in America these days: EVIL! An Islamic jihadist acts from an all- encompassing belief to the point that he cares not for his life. He cares only for advancing his view of Islam. In fact, his belief system is so strong that all reason, and even the prospect of pain and total physical obliteration could not alter his intent to kill, maim, destroy and annihilate those who stand in the way of the advancement of Islam.
War has been declared on us, dear readers. Like it or not, we have an evil foe to confront. Do we continue to allow the purveyors of disunity to diminish our ideals and our resolve? Will the epitaph for America read that disharmony and discord transformed a once proud and powerful nation into a land of whimpering fools, enabling corrupt and fraudulent leaders to extinguish their freedoms in favor of a 15th century method of mind control and slavery? Or do we screw up our courage, bolster it with an accurate view of the enemy and strike a lasting blow for the immutable Western principles of individualism, freedom and liberty?
Deo Vindice!
John B. retired after more than 40 years as an instructor, dean and provost in higher education. He currently resides in Brownsville, Texas, and San Miguel de Allende, Mexico, where he lectures on Mexican history, culture and politics. His views on Islam stem from 6 years spent living in the Middle East. For more information, you may consult his website:
www.johnbarham.com