![]() |
Sikeneh Mohamedi Ashtiani |
Sikenah Mohamedi Ashtiani, after years in prison, is still under a death sentence in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran, you might recall, as a stalwart defender of human rights, recently tried unsuccessfully to obtain membership on the U.N. Human Rights Commission.
A widow with two children, Ms. Ashtiani was charged with adultery, even though her supposed offense occurred after the death of her husband. Originally sentenced by a lower court in Azerbaijan during 2006, Ashtiani was punished with 99 lashes, in the presence of her teenage son.
Several months later, the case was reopened by a higher court, which eventually sentenced Ms. Ashtiani to death by stoning, even though, as a Turkish speaker, Ashtiani could not comprehend the court proceedings, which were conducted in Farsi. Perhaps reacting to demonstrations in Europe, Iran took a more "lenient" position, raising the possibility that Ms. Ashtiani might have her sentence commuted to death by hanging.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89cab/89cab5a7a12c8a5b41eb9d3f3c617daf8ea181fb" alt=""
Encouraged by Sorayah's aunt, Salebjam eventually realized that Sorayah's only hope for justice was to tell the world of her martyrdom. Barely escaping from the village elders, Salebjam eventually returned to France, where he was able to publish "The Stoning of Sorayah M."
In 2009, Salebjam's book finally made its way to the silver screen. Although it was honored by the Toronto Film Festival, the film never played to large audiences in the U.S. Nevertheless, it is a film of great emotion and reveals what apparently many Americans are unaware of: namely, that women in many Muslim countries are subject to the most depraved and nefarious of legal systems which stem from Sharia law, law that not only tyrannizes and represses them but, on occasion, subjects them to the brutality of stoning.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2da34/2da346f807e842755e1cc57bf40c3083e37efaf9" alt=""
Perhaps it is not so hard to believe that a country which goes by the oxymoronic name of "Islamic Republic" can prescribe such atrocious penalties. But it is difficult to believe that an American government would continue to seek a relationship that would have any value with the likes of Ahmaddinejad and the mad mullahs in Tehran.
Certainly, one would never wish to totally bring to an end the immigration of a single group into the U.S., for we should welcome any and all who come to these shores with a desire to work and to meld with our country's language, traditions, and culture and who arrive with a validated appreciation of our political institutions and our Constitution. That being said, it also goes without saying that we are truly involved in a war with a world-wide network of Islamic terrorists. It is only logical, therefore, that American immigration policies should reflect this reality, and any individuals seeking to enter this nation from Muslim lands should be subject to intense scrutiny.
No comments:
Post a Comment